Multiply the monthly rent by twelve, divide by the asking price, multiply by a hundred. If a residential flat comes out much below 3%, the price is running ahead of what the property actually earns. A ₹50 lakh flat should rent for about ₹12,500 a month to clear that bar; if it rents for ₹9,000, the rent supports a price closer to ₹36 lakh. That gap is not proof the flat is a bad buy. It is the part of the price you are paying for appreciation that has not happened yet.
Every other input into a property decision is a story someone is telling you. The builder’s price list is a story. The broker’s comparison to a sale three streets away is a story. The appreciation figure your uncle quotes from 2011 is a story with survivorship bias baked in.
Rent is different, because somebody is settling it in cash every month and can walk away. A tenant who thinks a flat is not worth ₹25,000 rents a different flat, and the landlord discovers his opinion was wrong within a quarter. Rent is the closest thing Indian residential property has to a continuously audited valuation.
So the ratio between the two — annual rent divided by asking price, expressed as a percentage — separates the part of a price that income supports from the part resting on a bet about the future. Both parts can be legitimate. But you should know the split before you sign, and most buyers never compute it.
Fair annual rent is roughly 3% of a residential property’s value. Stated the other way round: a fair price is about 33 times the annual rent, or roughly 400 times the monthly rent.
Work it through on a ₹50 lakh flat, assuming you are looking at gross rent before any costs:
The rental yield calculator runs both directions of this at once, for residential and commercial, so you can put in a listing price and a comparable rent and see the two implied numbers side by side.
The rule in one line: annual rent below 3% of the asking price means the price is leaning on appreciation rather than income. Every percentage point of shortfall is a bigger bet you are making on the future, whether or not anyone described it to you that way.
Indian residential yields are low by international standards, and that is not a recent development. The structural reasons are well documented: land prices in the metros ran far ahead of household incomes, rent control and tenancy law made landlords cautious about raising rents, and a large share of buying demand has been investment demand chasing capital gains rather than income.
| City | Gross yield range | Rent a ₹50 lakh flat would need |
|---|---|---|
| Hyderabad | 4% – 5% | ₹16,700 – ₹20,800 |
| Bengaluru | 3.5% – 5% | ₹14,600 – ₹20,800 |
| Chennai | 3.5% – 4.5% | ₹14,600 – ₹18,750 |
| Pune | 3% – 4.5% | ₹12,500 – ₹18,750 |
| Delhi NCR | 2.5% – 4% | ₹10,400 – ₹16,700 |
| Mumbai | 2% – 4% | ₹8,300 – ₹16,700 |
Here is something most articles on this topic will not tell you: the published figures do not agree with each other, and the spread is large enough to change a conclusion.
Brigade Group puts India’s national average gross yield at 5.16% as of Q2 2026 and calls 3–5% healthy for metros. Address Advisors, writing in the same year, lists residential at 2–3% flat. Older commentary from 99acres on why rental yield is one of the lowest in India describes metro yields in the low single digits. These are not small differences of opinion; a 2% benchmark and a 5% benchmark value the same rent at prices that differ by two and a half times.
The disagreement is mostly definitional. A national average sweeps in tier-2 and tier-3 cities where prices are low and yields are naturally higher, while a metro-focused figure does not. Some sources quote gross and some quote something closer to net. Some are drawing on listing data, which reflects asking rents rather than settled ones.
The practical response is not to pick the source that flatters your purchase. It is to use a deliberately conservative benchmark and treat clearing it as meaningful. 3% sits inside every serious estimate’s range for the big metros. A flat that cannot clear 3% has a pricing problem that no choice of source rescues it from.
If you are looking at a shop, an office unit or a warehouse, 3% is far too low a bar. Commercial property earns considerably more, and Address Advisors’ 2026 breakdown puts offices at 7–10%, retail at 9–12% and warehousing at 8–11%, against 2–3% for residential.
Those figures are higher than several other published estimates, which is why the calculator uses 6% for retail, 7% for office and 8% for warehouse — conservative floors rather than mid-range averages. The logic is the same as with residential: set the bar low enough that clearing it means something.
The gap between commercial and residential is not free money sitting on a table. Commercial leases run longer and carry contractual escalations, and the tenant typically bears more of the operating cost. But vacancies last far longer, replacing a tenant is much harder, and the asset is considerably less liquid if you need to exit in a hurry. The extra yield is payment for that risk. A retail unit at 6% and a flat at 3% can both be sensibly priced.
Every figure above is a gross yield — rent before property tax, society maintenance, repairs, brokerage on each re-let and the months between tenants. Net yield typically lands 1 to 1.5 percentage points lower. A flat showing 3% gross is realistically delivering closer to 2% once a full year is honestly accounted for.
This is one variable measured at one moment. It says nothing about whether a metro line is about to open two hundred metres away, whether the builder delivers on time, whether the title is clean, or whether the loan makes sense alongside everything else you owe. A property can fail this test decisively and still be the right purchase. That is precisely what a bet on appreciation is, and people win those bets.
What the check does is stop the bet from being invisible. There is a large difference between “I am paying 40% above what the rent supports because I expect this area to transform” and “the price seemed about right.” The first is a decision. The second is a purchase that happened to you.
If you want the fuller comparison — interest paid, stamp duty, maintenance, and the down payment that stopped compounding the day you handed it over — the rent versus buy calculator runs twenty years of both paths, and the worked version of that argument goes through a ₹1 crore flat line by line.
And once you own it, the flat stops being a decision and becomes a line item. It is usually the largest single number in an Indian household’s balance sheet and the one most likely to be carried at a figure somebody guessed years ago, which is the case for keeping it inside proper net worth tracking rather than in your head.
It is the asking price divided by the annual rent, and it is the same test as rental yield expressed the other way up. A 3% yield is a ratio of about 33. Indian metros commonly trade between 25 and 50, meaning a flat costs 25 to 50 years of its own rent. Anything above roughly 40 means the price is being carried almost entirely by appreciation expectations rather than income.
No, it means the price depends on appreciation rather than income. That can be perfectly reasonable in an area with genuine infrastructure or employment growth ahead of it. What a low yield tells you is the size of the bet you are making, so you can decide whether you believe it. A flat at 2% in a transforming suburb is a considered risk; the same flat at 2% in a mature, fully built-out locality is harder to justify.
Only roughly, and you should be more sceptical of the result. There is no actual rent yet, so you are working from what comparable completed units nearby currently fetch, which may not reflect what this building achieves on possession. You are also carrying construction risk and paying interest on a property producing nothing. As a rule, apply the rent of genuinely comparable finished stock, then treat a marginal result as a fail rather than a pass.
This checks whether one price is defensible; a rent-versus-buy comparison checks which of two paths leaves you wealthier. This needs two numbers and takes a minute. A full comparison needs the loan rate, tenure, stamp duty, maintenance, expected appreciation and the return you would have earned investing the down payment instead. Use this first to screen a property, then run the full comparison on the ones that survive.
Not beyond a point, because an unusually high yield is often the market pricing in a problem. A residential flat yielding 7% or 8% in a market where 3% is normal usually signals something specific: a title dispute, a building nearing the end of its useful life, a locality people are leaving, or a price that reflects difficulty reselling. Treat a yield far above the local norm as a question to investigate, not a bargain to hurry.
TLDR Money carries property alongside your funds, stocks, gold and EPF, net of the loan against it, so what the flat actually contributes to your net worth is a number you can look at. Subscription only — no brokerage, no distribution, no commission on anything you own.
Join the waitlistNo spam, ever.
This is an explanation, not advice about your money. TLDR Money is not a registered investment adviser and earns no commission on any product mentioned. Figures are illustrative; your own numbers, taxes and circumstances will differ.